Brief Announcement: Partition Approach to Failure Detectors for k-Set Agreement
نویسندگان
چکیده
There have been several studies on failure detectors for solving k-set agreement, a problem that requires n processes to decide on at most k (k < n) values proposed by the n processes in systems where processes may fail by crashing. In particular, Mostefaoui et.al. study the relationship among these failure detector classes and show that class Ωk is the weakest among them to solve k-set agreement [5]. Ωk was further conjectured in [6] to be the weakest failure detector for k-set agreement in the shared-memory model for all k > 1. In the message-passing model, It is shown in [5] that a majority of correct processes is necessary to solve kset agreement with Ωk. The majority requirement can be translated to the requirement of quorum failure detectors Σ [3]. Therefore, one may ask whether Ωk×Σ is the weakest failure detector for k-set agreement in the message-passing model, or whether Ωk is the weakest failure detector for k-set agreement in the message-passing model augmented with Σ, when k > 1. In this announcement, we report our study in [2], in which we introduce the partition approach to define weaker failure detectors for k-set agreement in the message-passing model. We apply the partition approach and propose two partitioned failure detectors Πk and Π S k , and show that they are strong enough to solve k-set agreement but are strictly
منابع مشابه
Weakening Failure Detectors for k -Set Agreement Via the Partition Approach
In this paper, we propose the partition approach and define several new classes of partitioned failure detectors weaker than existing failure detectors for the k-set agreement problem in both the shared-memory model and the message-passing model. In the shared-memory model with n + 1 processes, for any 2 ≤ k ≤ n, we first propose a partitioned failure detector ΠΩk that solves k-set agreement wi...
متن کاملLower Bounds with Unreliable Failure Detectors (brief Announcement)
This paper takes place in the context of fault tolerant distributed computing. We investigate the eeciency of decision algorithm using unreliable failure detectors. We prove some lower bounds for Consensus Problem. In particular, we show that the longest message chain of all algorithms using a strong failure detector is greater than the number of processes, no matter the number of faulty proces...
متن کامل(anti−Ω × Σz)-based k-set Agreement Algorithms
This paper considers the k-set agreement problem in a crash-prone asynchronous message passing system enriched with failure detectors. Two classes of failure detectors have been previously identified as necessary to solve asynchronous k-set agreement: the class anti-leader anti−Ω and the weak-quorum class Σk. The paper investigates the families of failure detector (anti−Ωx)1≤x≤n and (Σz)1≤z≤n. ...
متن کاملThe upper domatic number of powers of graphs
Let $A$ and $B$ be two disjoint subsets of the vertex set $V$ of a graph $G$. The set $A$ is said to dominate $B$, denoted by $A rightarrow B$, if for every vertex $u in B$ there exists a vertex $v in A$ such that $uv in E(G)$. For any graph $G$, a partition $pi = {V_1,$ $V_2,$ $ldots,$ $V_p}$ of the vertex set $V$ is an textit{upper domatic partition} if $V_i rightarrow V_j$ or $V_j rightarrow...
متن کاملThe Combined Power of Conditions and Information on Failures to Solve Asynchronous Set Agreement
To cope with the impossibility of solving agreement problems in asynchronous systems made up of n processes and prone to t process crashes, system designers tailor their algorithms to run fast in “normal” circumstances. Two orthogonal notions of “normality” have been studied in the past through failure detectors that give processes information about process crashes, and through conditions that ...
متن کامل